What is the Fork Choice Rule?

Fork Choice Rule is present as one of the security innovations in Ethereum. Understand this topic in full in this article. Watch until the end!

What is the Fork Choice Rule?

Fork Choice Rule is an important mechanism in Ethereum that allows nodes to reach consensus on the canonical chain when the network experiences fork divergence. To understand the complexity of this process, it is important to dive into the basic concepts and investigate what is meant by a fork in Ethereum.

Unpacking Forks in Ethereum

A fork represents a divergence in the blockchain, causing the network to split into two chains. This occurs when some nodes upgrade to new software while others remain on old software.

Upgraded nodes follow the new chain, while the remaining nodes remain on the original chain. This creates a parallel version of the blockchain, introducing complexity that is managed through careful protocols and mechanisms.

DAO Fork - Trigger of Change

One of the most famous Ethereum forks came from the infamous DAO hack in 2016. The DAO, designed as a decentralized venture capital fund, experienced a massive exploit, resulting in $50 million worth of Ether funds being drained.

To recover stolen funds and restore trust, Ethereum underwent a hard fork. This decision was controversial due to conflicting views regarding compliance with Ethereum principles, resulting in the formation of Ethereum Classic and the dominant Ethereum chain.

Understanding the Fork Choice Rule

The Fork Choice Rule serves as a guiding logic for nodes to evaluate candidate competing chains and reach consensus on valid chains. It acts as an umpire, determining the validity of the fork.

Without a clear Fork Choice Rule, Ethereum risks being trapped in obscurity, with a flood of forks leading to a consensus collapse. These rules form a synchronized progression amidst conflicting perspectives, playing a fundamental role in Ethereum's order and security.

The Longest Rule - A Simple Approach

The Longest Rule is the simplest Fork Choice Rule, guiding nodes to follow the fork with the largest number of mined blocks. This relies on the principle that greater hash power reflects miner consent.

However, these rules are vulnerable to attack, lacking the ability to capture complex accuracy metrics. Advanced protocols such as GHOST overcome these limitations by incorporating more comprehensive criteria when weighing forks.

GHOST Protocol - Improves Fork Selection

GHOST (Greedy Heaviest Observed SubTree) improves security by considering more than just chain length when evaluating forks. This includes "uncle" blocks - discarded blocks that are not included in the main chain.

By taking uncle blocks into account, GHOST offers a more complete representation of miner activity, making assessments more informed. This protocol prevents secret mining attacks that may occur in the Longest Rule, increasing accuracy through holistic evaluation of network activity.

EIP-155 and Re-Attack Prevention

EIP-155, in response to the vulnerability, modifies Ethereum's signature scheme to counter replay attacks. Transactions are now tied to specific forks via specific chain IDs, preventing unauthorized rebroadcasting of transactions on different forks. This modification improves the Fork Choice Rule, strengthening the validity of transactions in a particular chain.

Ethereum 2.0 Implementation - A New Chapter

The Ethereum Merge, marking a significant shift in architecture, replaced proof-of-work with proof-of-stake. This change reduces dependence on mining power, significantly reducing energy consumption.

As Ethereum advances, the Fork Choice Rule continues to evolve to accommodate the new technical landscape introduced by The Merge. The Ethereum community continues to innovate, ensuring the security and resilience of the network in this new phase of development.

DISCLAIMER: This article is informational in nature and is not an offer or invitation to sell or buy any crypto assets. Trading crypto assets is a high-risk activity. Crypto asset prices are volatile, where prices can change significantly from time to time and Bittime is not responsible for changes in fluctuations in crypto asset exchange rates.